Thursday, May 31, 2012
IN MY OPINION (Column)
This Week’s Agenda: Shenanigans in the Legislature
By JON COUPAL
Citizens of California are almost always in danger from being victimized by the foolhardy actions of our Legislature. But some weeks are more dangerous than others – and this is one of those weeks.
Why? Under the Joint Rules of the Legislature, this is the last week for each house to pass the bills that began in their respective houses, also known as the “house of origin.” Thus, the environment is ripe for a higher rate of backroom deals, anti-taxpayer laws and special interests bills. The only thing they have in common is that rarely do these actions result in any public good at all.
Although hundreds of bills will be part of this legislative scrum this week, with sessions going late into the evenings, HJTA’s Legislative Director, David Wolfe, will be monitoring a few specific bills with intense interest because of their threat to taxpayers.
First, AB 1500 by Speaker John Perez is a billion dollar tax increase. Being sold as “closing a tax loophole,” the proposal, nonetheless, would be a massive transfer of wealth from California’s beleaguered business community to government coffers. While HJTA is supportive of tax reform, any change in the tax law must, at a minimum, be “revenue neutral,” meaning that there would be no net tax revenue increase to the state. As a tax increase, this bill would require a two-thirds vote of each house. This means, absent a handful of Republicans who defy the strong wishes of their constituencies, that the bill will have a hard time clearing its house of origin, the California Assembly.
Nonetheless, the pressure will be intense to grab the tax dollars that this bill would take from businesses because the Legislature has yet to cure its addiction to overspending.
Another bill threatens the victory that property rights advocates won against the redevelopment industry last year. SB 1220 would impose a $75 tax on various filings filled out by homeowners and other property owners for the purpose of funding “affordable housing” programs. But owning property in California is already tough enough.
We don’t need another property tax the kind of which is not imposed in any other state. Moreover, we believe this to be a backdoor attempt at starting to resurrect redevelopment agencies in California.
Those agencies died last year as the result of a Supreme Court ruling and, for everyone’s benefit, they deserve to remain in the grave.
The upshot is that this is going to be a busy week for our Legislative Director as he roams the halls of the Legislature protecting the interests of taxpayers late into the night. Millions of California homeowners probably don’t know they have their own lobbyist in Sacramento fighting against the special interests and higher taxes. Hopefully, the word will get out.
Copyright 2012, Metropolitan News Company