Monday, August 23, 2010
Appeals Court: Fake Nurse Must Repay Wages Earned
By STEVEN M. ELLIS, Staff Writer
A woman who stole the identities of registered nurses to obtain work must pay back wages and benefits she received, even though she actually did the work for which she was paid, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday.
Upholding a restitution order by a federal judge in Fairbanks, Alaska, the three-judge panel said Becky Nadine Hunter had to repay former employers more than $18,000 because they did not receive the services they paid for: those of a “licensed” nurse.
Hunter was convicted of five counts of mail fraud and other crimes after federal prosecutors accused her of devising as many as 21 aliases to defraud employers and lenders, as well as the state and federal governments.
The mail fraud charges arose from a series of false documents Hunter mailed to obtain employment as a nurse when she moved to Alaska in 1998. Prosecutors said she acquired nursing licenses in the state using the names, Social Security numbers, birth dates and credentials of two nurses who lived in New York and Canada.
Hunter used the first license she obtained, along with a false employment history and other information, to get a job in 1998 as a school nurse with the Fairbanks North Star Borough School District. The district paid her $12,558 in wages and benefits, but fired her after discovering her false identity.
Hunter later used a similar set of false documents to obtain a nursing position with the U.S. Department of Labor, where she was paid $5,457. She was arrested in 2004 following an investigation by the FBI, the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Postal Service.
U.S. District Court Judge Ralph R. Beistline of the District of Alaska sentenced Hunter to 96 months incarceration after she successfully appealed her initial sentence, and he ordered her to make restitution in full to the North Star Borough and the Department of Labor under the federal Mandatory Victims Restitution Act.
Hunter appealed, arguing that her former employers would receive windfalls if she was required to repay wages for work she actually performed, but the Ninth Circuit rejected the argument in an opinion by U.S. District Judge G. Murray Snow of the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.
Noting that the purpose of restitution under the MVRA is not to punish a defendant but to make victims whole by reimbursing actual losses, Snow said the district court did not err in concluding that Hunter’s former employers were victims of her conduct.
“Both [North Star] Borough and the Department of Labor were directly and proximately harmed by Hunter’s mail fraud because they paid for the services of a licensed nurse that were never received…,” he wrote. “If Hunter had not mailed false documents reflecting fictitious nursing credentials, she could not legally have been employed in positions that required a valid nursing license, and a qualified licensed nurse could have been employed instead.”
Snow similarly rejected Hunter’s assertion that the restitution order should have deducted the value of services she provided that did not require her to hold a nursing license.
“This conclusion accords with traditional principles of contract law,” he explained, pointing to treatises by Corbin and Farnsworth. “When an individual fails to comply with licensing requirements aimed at protecting health and safety rather than merely raising revenue, that individual can maintain ‘no action for the promised compensation or for quantum meruit.’ ”
Judges Raymond C. Fisher and Marsha S. Berzon joined Snow in his opinion.
The case is United States v. Hunter, No. 09-30246.
Copyright 2010, Metropolitan News Company